This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was MERGE/REDIRECT
Delete strong POV and not even very informative, Wegsjac 14:03, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Keep, Cleanup, Expand. As currently written, this is an NPOV rant, but unlike Parentectomy, also on VfD below, it is not a made up term. Rather, "Best interest of the child" is the standard that most courts use in making decisions involving child welfare (and not just custody decisions). I'll see what I can do with it. -- 8^Dgab 15:11, 2005 Apr 5 (UTC)
Keep Important legal standard. Klonimus 16:38, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete and redirect as per Gazpacho. Arkyan 16:58, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
@#&$! Oops - didn't know there was already a Best interests article - I'll merge the info to it, and suggest that the page under consideration here be redirected there... and it's done. -- 8^Dgab 20:53, 2005 Apr 5 (UTC)
Keep. This is not a good article at the moment, but it's not so bad that all the content must go. Coupled with the fact that Best Interest of the Child is an important principle in family law, and that we should have an article on it, it should be kept, but improved.
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.